NOTE: This post is based on something I put in a Facebook group in Eleventh Month 2017.
For weeks, I have been shaking my head in sadness and disbelief at the fact that at least two monthly meetings in Philadelphia Yearly Meeting have insensitively sent letters to low-income Friends, asking (telling?) them that they owe membership dues of several hundred dollars or more. How is this in keeping with the practice of not requiring tithes?
Then I went looking for the "dues" of Abington Meeting, since that is one meeting where I've heard of these letters going out. (I don't know if these fees are called "dues" or something else.)
Before I found what I was looking for on the meeting's website, I had to click on the link about Benjamin Lay. I was so glad to see an excerpt from an approved minute from Quakers in North London in the U.K., naming racism and white supremacy! Such minutes are a start.
Once we name an injustice, we can see the injustice--and vice versa. Once we name and see an injustice, we can begin to respond to it. Once we respond to an injustice, we can begin to work to prevent it. Once we prevent an injustice, we can work toward healing. As we work toward healing, we can build the treasured multiracial community we yearn for.
- See injustice --> Name it
- Name the injustice --> Respond to it
- Respond to injustice --> Work to prevent similar injustice
- Prevent similar injustice --> Work toward healing
- See, name, and build on the healing --> Build multiracial community
"In the UK, the North London Area Meeting minute, Agreed on 18 November 2017 reads as follows:
Quakers are proud of the times in history we have been ahead of our time on progressive social issues – but preceding those moments, there have often been long periods when we have not walked the path we would later understand to be the just one. At a time when racism seems as present and ugly as ever – both globally and nationally – and the structures of white supremacy are being defended and strengthened by powerful forces in our societies, this seems a timely moment for North London Area Meeting to reflect on its involvement in the struggle for racial justice."North London Area Meeting recognises Benjamin Lay’s dedication to equality – and his willingness to repeatedly speak his messages of Truth. We also recognise Benjamin Lay as being a Friend of the Truth – and as being in unity with the spirit of our Area Meeting. We ask our Clerking team to write to Philadelphia Yearly Meeting, Abington Monthly Meeting and Southern East Anglia Area Meeting (successor to Colchester; Coggeshall Monthly Meeting) to clarify that Lay is in good standing with North London Area Meeting (successor to Devonshire House Monthly Meeting).”
The more I see and name injustices, such as implying that members of our meetings "ought" to contribute financially at a certain level, the more I see how Friends carry out injustice in a manner that is not so very different from what occurs outside of our Quaker communities.
Blessings,
Liz
2 comments:
Wow, a Quaker meeting requiring financial support from members, even impoverished members!
Though I've read quite a bit of Friends history, I don't recall any meetings do this.
Do you know if the Friends meetings requiring financial giving have done this for many years?
Maybe it came out of the "Quiet" period in the 1800's when, sadly, Friends congregations tended to regulate/control their members' lives (meaning well, of course)?
I've never belonged to a Friends meeting (or for that matter a Baptist church back in my youth) where donations were required.
And thanks for charting the steps of seeking justice. I've copied that to my computer desktop as a reminder to daily seek to do just that.
Great to hear from you again, Daniel. And of course, I'm glad to be getting back to some blog writing!
To be clear, nothing on Abington Meeting's website that I could see says that they "require" membership dues or fees. What's problematic in practice, though, in that meeting and at least one other one I've heard about, is that the meeting's actions send a nonverbal message of what is expected. The meeting apparently sends out reminder letters of the requested "contribution" per persons in a given household, but without an equally powerful assurance that monetary gifts aren't required.
I don't know that Friends from the meetings in question even approach the individual Friends who find the amount burdensome to have a caring, respectful conversation...
Blessings,
Liz
Post a Comment